Facing intense competition and increasingly tighter budgets, businesses across all industries have been looking for ways to optimize their ad spend and maximize their ROI. To determine which campaigns work and which don’t, solid marketing measurement tools are not optional, but a must. Indeed, modern marketing is facing major transformations: with the gradual fade-out of third-party cookies and multiplying touchpoints both on and offline, one cannot rely solely on attribution. Designed to assign credit to different touchpoints based on user behavior, attribution was the go-to model for many years, thriving on the then-wide accessibility of third-party cookies. But with limiting factors such as their deprecation on several major browsers and increased regulation, such as RGPD, this once-ubiquitous model might not be enough anymore.
To circumvent this, marketers find themselves completing their measurement approach with Marketing Mix Modeling, or MMM, and incrementality testing. This methodology helps marketers determine whether their campaigns are what is driving customer interest, or if demand would have been the same without them.
For a deep dive on marketing measurement in audio form, listen to our Data Break podcast episode with fifty-five UK’s Head of Media Nick Yang and Funnel’s VP of Measurement János Moldvay. The following article contains insights explored in more detail throughout the episode (French version entirely dedicated to incrementality testing available here).
Incrementality testing is a methodology designed to measure the causal impact of marketing initiatives through controlled experiments.
While attribution determines which touchpoint of the user journey led to a conversion, incrementality testing pinpoints the real effect of marketing by comparing a group exposed to an ad (test group) with a group that is not (control group).
For example, out of 1,000 conversions, how many were driven by an ad campaign? How many customers would have made a purchase regardless of marketing actions? Incrementality testing helps answer these exact questions.
While traditional attribution models (such as last-click or multi-touch attribution) are growing less reliable, incrementality testing provides a clearer picture of actual marketing effectiveness by:
To conduct an incrementality test, marketers must follow a structured approach:
- Test Group: individuals who will be exposed to the marketing campaign
- Control Group (or Holdout Group): Individuals who will not be exposed to the campaign
While incrementality testing is powerful, this methodology is not without challenges:
Data Volume & Statistical Significance – Small sample sizes can produce unreliable results. Select a large enough audience and adjust test duration to ensure that the results obtained are relevant.
External Variables – As many factors can affect test results, from market shifts to competitor actions and seasonality, they must be accounted for in the analysis process.
Cost & Implementation – Some businesses hesitate to use holdout groups because it means deliberately excluding potential customers from a campaign. Still, the long-term benefits of better budget allocation often outweigh short-term losses.
Here are fifty-five’s best practices to maximize the impact of incrementality testing:
Incrementality testing can be an invaluable tool for brands looking to understand how effective their advertising efforts truly are. By measuring the real impact of marketing actions, businesses can base their decisions on actual data, optimize their spending strategy, and improve campaign performance. If you would like to start testing and uncover the true ROI of your marketing efforts, don’t hesitate to get in touch with us! And to discover how fifty-five combined a custom, in-house MMM with incrementality testing to help TotalEnergies save +$4M, read our case study.
Discover all the latest news, articles, webinar replays and fifty-five events in our monthly newsletter, Tea O'Clock.